Singapore opposition voters have “five years to live and repent”

From time to time, Canadian opposition parties accuse the government of giving better treatment – increased funding for local infrastructure projects, stronger support for local industries, greater satisfaction on immigration applications for family members, and so on — to ridings held by the governing party.

The governing party’s traditional response is to fight such accusations as forcefully as possible regardless of the truth of the matter. This is what happened when Conservative cabinet minister Tony Clement was accused of shoveling too much G8 money to his Muskoka riding last summer.

This familiar old parliamentary ritual exists because Canadian public opinion is overwhelmingly opposed to the appearance (and perhaps the reality) of special rewards for ridings which elect government MPs. As an indication of the maturity of Canadian democracy, this is a Very Good Thing.

However, like other Very Good Things (such as indoor plumbing, safety from bandits, and a life expectancy beyond 35) the people who live under its toasty magnificence can get so used to it that they forget how Very Good a Thing it is. Every now and then it is a good idea to share stories of faraway places which do not have this Good Thing. In this case we shall whisper about Singapore, the rich little country where I was born.

While campaigning during the island’s recent general election, an 87-year-old man named Lee Kuan Yew warned voters in the government-held constituency (i.e., district) of Aljunied that they would have “five years to live and repent”  if they gave the six available seats to the opposition Worker’s Party.

A little background information: Lee Kuan Yew is the father of Singapore’s current prime minister. He is also the country’s founding deity. Lee the Elder served ruled as prime minister from 1959 to 1990 before moving on to specially created ‘Senior Minister’ and ‘Minister Mentor’ posts in the cabinets of his two successors. In his worst election performance in 31 years as leader of the governing People’s Action Party, the party still won 77 out of 79 seats in Parliament.

When this brilliant and ruthless elder statesman used the word ‘repent’ to the voters in Aljunied, he was reminding them that the PAP is in the business of rewarding ‘loyal’ constituencies and punishing ‘disloyal’ ones. The two previous opposition strongholds, Potong Pasir and Hougang, were starved of infrastructure funding and other municipal upgrades for many years, at a time when other constituencies were enjoying the benefits of Singapore’s economic explosion.

When asked to explain his recent warning to opposition voters, Mr. Lee said “you must expect the PAP to look after PAP constituencies first.” This is a restrained and polished version of the answer he would have given 15 or 20 years ago, which would have been something along the lines of “if they wanted services from us then they should have voted for us.” When these tactics are used in Singapore, they are used openly because they are intended to serve as well-publicized deterrents to further dissent.

Now imagine the high holy hell which would break loose if Stephen Harper were to say something so aggressively unvarnished in a Canadian election campaign. Past and present Canadian governments have certainly used similarly partisan considerations when making policy decisions. But Mr. Harper would never do anything like this publicly because it would be too far outside the accepted political playing field.

The accepted range of political activity shifts as a democracy matures. Sometimes, tied up in our own worthy partisan disputes, Canadians forget that progress has been made. This is the Very Good Thing about the Canadian political landscape which I want to highlight.

Here endeth the reminder.

***

p.s. It looks like the Singaporean population is also shifting its accepted political playing field. Many voters reacted harshly against Lee Kuan Yew’s comments, and candidates from the opposition Worker’s Party won all six seats in Aljunied on May 7th.

Lee the Elder is still an MP, having won his seat in the only uncontested constituency in the country. But Prime Minister Lee the Younger has very politely removed his father from the cabinet for the first time since 1959.

Hot Docs / Abendland

Abendland is director Nikolaus Geyrhalter’s film essay about the modern industrial West as seen during the night. There is no narration, no soundtrack, and no plot. I dozed off twice. It is a brilliant documentary.

The film is a compilation of unrelated night-time scenes shot across Europe: a nursing home, a Bavarian beer hall, an anti-nuclear protest, a crematorium, a phone sex operation, a security surveillance room, a rave, a mass deportation operation, a carefully guarded border, etc. Together, these capsules describe human activity in a wealthy and highly ordered part of the world.

The logistical skeleton of a society becomes more visible at night, when the frenetic activity of the day recedes. Even the raucous beer hall is built on an ordered behind-the-scenes structure. Massive quantities of food and drink are assembled in industrial kitchens and transported to the gigantic main hall for consumption. Participants who consume too much are then stretchered from the main hall to the built-in first aid centre by numbered teams of paramedics.

The beer hall produces and manages fun in a safe and efficient way. The crematorium produces and manages death just as efficiently, with two late-night employees moving an assembly line of unmarked coffins into mechanized furnaces. Intimacy is produced and managed at the phone sex studio and the government-regulated brothel, security at the surveillance centre, and kindness at the nursing home for seniors.

Fun, death, intimacy, security, kindness, and other traditional aspects of individuality, each achieved in an impersonal or mass-produced setting. It is depressing if you are attached to the idea that your crazy night out on the town last night was completely spontaneous, utterly unprecedented, and metaphysically unique. But if you’re comfortable with the idea that our lives and choices follow basic patterns and preferences, and that our societies are structured along certain bureaucratic and logistical ‘grand plans’, then you’ll find this film to be a fascinating exposition of these structures.

To do: I really want to watch Nikolaus Geyrhalter’s previous film essay about mechanization in the food industry, called Our Daily Bread.

Happy 45th, This Magazine!

Publisher Lisa Whittington-Hill, editor Graham F. Scott, and the rest of the team at This Magazine have probably been working far harder than is healthy in order to put together the special 45th anniversary edition of this discreetly venerable magazine. Looking forward to reading it!

Click here for Graham’s blog post on what to expect in the May 2011 issue. If you want great coverage of Canadian politics and culture and you’re not satisfied with mainstream publications, make sure to pick up a copy. You’ll find the magazine at Book City (independent) and Chapters/Indigo (not) outlets.

Better yet, subscribe! You’ll find out about inspiring new grassroots initiatives months before the stories make it into the Globe and the Star.

My internship with Graham and Lisa was my introduction to the world of alternative and independent Canadian magazines. Here are some other gems I’ve come across:

Canadian Dimension is a general interest publication based in Winnipeg. As far as I know, it is the only progressive magazine in the country which is older than This.

The Ryerson Review of Journalism is about journalism.

Quill and Quire is a magazine about the Canadian book trade. 76 years old.

Spacing is a magazine about public space and Toronto’s urban landscape. Multiple winner in the “small magazine of the year” category at the National Magazine Awards.

Geist is a very clever magazine of ideas based in Vancouver.

Briarpatch is a fiery general interest magazine based in Regina.

Taddle Creek is based in Toronto and publishes fiction and poetry from new writers. It does not like to be categorized.

Chomsky’s reaction to bin Laden’s death

Click here if you’d like to read Noam Chomsky’s reaction to the assassination of the most hated person in the western world, posted on the website of Guernica magazine.

It takes enormous courage to put forward a critical response to an event which you know will receive glowing coverage in the autobiography of the the society in which you live. Twitter reported that the announcement of bin Laden’s death sparked its highest rate of sustained activity on record, peaking at about 5,000 tweets per second when President Obama finished his remarks. These people were not mourning.

Chomsky is the most prominent professional outsider operating in the United States today. He is part of an important group of people who have poked and prodded at the shared beliefs and central myths of their respective societies, and who have been reviled and ridiculed by the majority for doing so.

Good role model.

#elxn41

I don’t have a Twitter account, but if I did…

Globe and Mail happy to move on from “unremarkable” election.

Liberals collapse. CBC demands recount. Toronto Star avoids making eye contact.

Peter Mansbridge slays Evan Solomon, keeps throne for one more election cycle.

Senate reform, Mr. Harper? Make Preston proud.

308 seats, 76 female MPs. 40 from the NDP.

Hug a Liberal. Offer a free fake mustache.

Hello, Rathika Sitsabaiesan — first Tamil MP. Goodbye, Lawrence Cannon. We have a boat you can use.

Thomas Mulcair opens small business — government-subsidized French-language tutoring service.

Federalists learn that Quebecois can be remarkably friendly when not being beaten with a stick.

Liberals, don’t eat your young. Eat your old.

Don’t worry about the Manley Liberals. Their personal shoppers have already picked out some lovely blue ensembles.

Wanted: new director for the Munk School of Global Affairs. Successful communicators preferred.

Dion smiled. Discreetly.

Liberals, go Green. She’s the best thing that could ever happen to you.